|
|
|
Fate of ligno-cellulosic components and urea-nitrogen in urea-ammoniated wheat straw Elangovan A. V.*, Kishan Jai, Sahoo A.1 Department of Animal Nutrition & Feed Technology College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry Mathura - 281 001, India. *Reprint request: Dr. A. V. Elangovan, Division of Nutrition & Feed Technology, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 122, India. Tel: +91-581-447261; Fax: +91-581-447321; E-mail: elangocari@rediffmail.com
1Present address: Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, India.
Abstract Effect of both incubation and exposure time on the loss of ammonia-N was tested during the process of urea-ammoniation of wheat straw. The straw chaffed to a size of 5 mm length was ammoniated with 5% urea at 40% moisture level and incubated for 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks in a air tight glass desiccator having a capacity of 4 kg. Periodically, the incubated lots were exposed, and aired over 3 × 3 sq. ft. area for the determination of N. Representative samples of ammoniated straw were collected after 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,10,14 and 21 days of exposure to determine the DM, CP, CF, ADF, NDF and lignin content in the straw. Due to air drying there was a similar trend in moisture disappearance in all incubated samples with a DM content of 60% on day 1 which air dried to reach a figure of 93% on day 21. The samples from 1 week incubation showed incomplete ammoniation with a CP content of 16.39% on day 1 and it reduced to 10.19% on day 21, a reduction of only 38% due to higher percentage of residual urea-N (51%) compared to 3 and 4 weeks incubated samples. Up on aeration, the CP content on 21st day post exposure was reduced by 38% in 1 and 2 weeks incubated samples compared to 60% in the later. There was a declining trend in CP content which remained almost constant at 6 to 7% in both 3 and 4 weeks incubated lot. No significant difference in CF, ADF and lignin content of treated and untreated straw was seen. However, a reduction of 2to 3 units in NDF and lignocellulose fraction was seen in 3 and 4 weeks incubated samples. From the study of N input to the straw a meagre of 15% N was retained in urea-ammoniated straw resulting in a net gain of only about 55% N by the straw which is available for animal feeding. Top Key words Urea, arnmoniation, straw, ligno-cellulose, nitrogen. Top | INTRODUCTlON Crop residues that constitute the bulk in the rationing of animals are poor in nutritional support due to inaccessibility to its structural integrity supported by ligno-cellulo-hemicellulosic complex. A variable degree of alkali solubilization of ester bonds draws maximum attention towards alkali treatment of straws and stovers and urea-ammoniation has been found to be most promising due to its added non-protein nitrogen which might have contributed to increased crude protein content. But, a great deal of variability does exist due to loss of added nitrogen during the process of incubation and further during the feeding of the treated straw when the free ammonia gets escaped on its exposure to open air (Sundstol et al, 1978). For cutting down the treatment time, use of urease or its source (Jayasuriya and Pearce, 1983, Lohani et al, 1986) and the airtight incubation procedure to preserve moisture level and to raise the heap temperature (Ibrahim, 1986) are in practice. In the present experiment large size glass desiccator was used to provide air-tight compartment and different incubation time was studied for binding of urea-ammonia to the straw during urea-ammoniation process and also post exposure loss of urea-N was studied. |
Top Materials and Methods Wheat straw was chaffed to a size of 5mm length and was ammoniated with 5% urea (w/w) at 40% moisture level. Treated straw was filled in four air-tight glass desiccator of 4 kg capacity and incubated for 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks at room temperature (30–38°C). |
Representative samples for the analysis of N were collected following different incubation periods from the incubated desiccators after thorough mixing of the contents, immediately by opening the lid and weighed amount was put into kjeldahl flask containing concentrated sulphuric acid. The incubated lots were exposed and aerated over 3 × 3 sq. ft. area. Dry matter and nitrogen content were analysed periodically following 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days of exposure. The DM, CP, CF (AOAC, 1990), ADF, NDF and lignin (Van Soest, et al 1991) content in the straw was analysed only in the 21 days post exposure samples. Content of residual urea unhydrolysed was also analysed (Watt and Chrisp, 1954). |
Top Results and Discussion Chemical composition The moisture content in the urea-treated straw before incubation was 41.06% which reduced to 40.2, 39.6, 38.3 and 37.3% in 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks incubated samples respectively, suggesting that the chamber was more or less air-tight with very marginal loss of moisture that increased with the increase in incubation time. Due to post-exposure air drying all the samples dried to an extent of 92.4–93.3% (Table 1). The CP content in post-exposure treated straw was 6.2%. The higher value in 1 and 2 weeks incubated samples was attributed to higher percentage of unhydrolysed urea-N (50.7 and 30.9%, respectively). Similar CP content in urea-ammoniated straw was also observed in earlier studies (Mandal et al, 1997; Bhar et al, 1998).
The fibre components showed variable results with no significant change in ADF, lignin and cellulose content between control and treated straw, but a reduction in NDF and hemicellulose content by 2–3 units in treated straw (lc3 and lc4) exposed to 3 and 4 weeks of incubation. A possible alkali hydrolysis of hemicellulose may have resulted in its solubilization in neutral detergent solution which resulted in decrease in NDF and hemicellulose. Cloete and Kritzinger (1984) and Caneque et al (1998) also observed decreased hemicellulose and NDF content in urea-ammoniated straw. The non-significant change in fibre components in 1 and 2 weeks incubated samples (Icl and lc2) was also indicative of incomplete ammoniation process which complete after 3 and 4 weeks of incubation. An increase in moisture level favours ureolysis (Ibrahim, 1986; Hassoun et al 1990) and may thus increases hemicellulose degradation (Van Soest et al 1984). To the contrary, effect of urea treatment on ADF and ADL fractions are variable with no change (Nelson et al 1985; Caneque et al 1998), a slight increase (Mandell et al 1988) or a slight decrease (Reid et al 1988). Fate of urea-N From the CP content in 2, 3 and 4 weeks incubated samples (13.9, 13.8 and 13.6, respectively), it was quite evident that urea hydrolysis reached a maximum of 70% at 2 weeks of incubation and a lot of free ammonia-N got escaped into the atmosphere untrapped even after 4 weeks of incubation (Table 1). An increased CP value (16.4%) in 1st week incubated sample was contributed by unhydrolysed urea which remained as incompletely hydrolyzed urea molecule on the external surface of whreat straw. This was further supported by the findings that the analysis of residual urea in the treated straw gave more concentration in the 1st week incubated sample (Table 3). A lower CP value in the straw minus the residual urea-N concluded for incomplete trapping of ammonia as a result of ureolysis, which was observed to be complete by 3 and/or 4 weeks of incubation. Most of nitrogen retained in the straw is in the form of free ammonia (Solaiman et al 1979) which lost during airing, storing or processing. In the present experiment 37.80, 38.84, 55.07 and 54.41 per cent of free ammonia of the treated straw was lost during airing, which accounted to 47.16, 41.34, 58.18 and 56.65% loss of the added urea-N. A lower value in 1 and 2 weeks incubated samples was indicative of incomplete ammoniation. It was further noticed that the loss of free ammonia from the exposed lot became almost complete after 7 days of exposure (Table 1). The total ammonia loss to the atmosphere starting from day 1 of incubation to day 21 of post exposure of the ammoniated wheat straw was summed to be 48.23,61.24, 78.85 and 78.85% of the added urea-N. The loss was considered to be of major concern for the environmentalists as well as the nutritionists and efforts are therefore, being made to reduce the total loss through various methods of trapping the free ammonia (Borhami et al 1982; Cloete and Kritzinger, 1984; Yadav and Virk, 1994, Mandal et al 1997; Bhar et al., 1998; Dass et al, 2000).
On the other hand, retention of nitrogen, which always misquoted to be 75–80% was a meagre 15% in the post-exposure treated straw. Above all, a net gain of only 55% was observed in the treated straw that had undergone 4 weeks of incubation. Caneque et al (1998) observed a maximum N-retention of 39.69% as a percentage of added urea-N at maximum ureolysis, which they obtained at a moisture level of 40% and temperature 35°C. Chermiti et al, (1989) also observed the N-retention between 25 and 31%. In the present study, the moisture level was maintained at about 40% and a similar expression of N-retention was observed to be 14.35% in 4 weeks incubated sample. Contrary to earlier findings the lower value was attributed to post exposure loss of ammonia N. Bhar et al (1998) advocated differentisealing methods to check the loss of ammonia-N during incubation, and they could be able to reduce the loss to 32% from as high as 48% and the moisture level was also better preserved to give a net N loss of 43% after 72h of air exposure. The residual urea-N which adds to the increased N content of treated straw even after airing for 21 days, contributed significantly to total N availability from treated straw. Urea-ammoniation process was thus found to be complete after 3 weeks of incubation at a moisture level of around 40% and temperature 30–38°C. Top Tables Table 1: Changes in DM and CP content (%DM basis) of ammoniated wheat straw during post exposure period
| Post exposure period (days) | Incubation period (weeks) |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
|
|
| DM | CP | DM | CP | DM | CP | DM | CP |
| 1 | 59.8 | 16.4 | 60.4 | 13.9 | 61.9 | 13.8 | 62.7 | 13.6 | 2 | 80.2 | 12.1 | 83.2 | 10.6 | 84.8 | 9.8 | 80.3 | 10.0 | 3 | 85.6 | 11.8 | 86.5 | 10.3 | 87.0 | 9.4 | 84.8 | 9.7 | 4 | 88.2 | 11.4 | 89.6 | 9.4 | 89.1 | 8.2 | 87.8 | 8.3 | 5 | 89.9 | 11.2 | 90.7 | 9.3 | 90.6 | 7.6 | 89.5 | 7.9 | 6 | 91.1 | 11.1 | 92.4 | 9.2 | 92.7 | 7.2 | 92.9 | 7.1 | 7 | 92.4 | 11.1 | 92.7 | 9.2 | 93.1 | 6.9 | 93.3 | 7.1. | 10 | — | 11.0 | — | 9.0 | — | 6.7 | — | 6.4 | 14 | — | 10.8 | — | 8.9 | — | 6.6 | — | 6.2 | 21 | — | 10.2 | — | 8.5 | — | 6.2 | — | 6.2 |
| | Table 2: Changes in ligno-cellulosic composition of wheat straw after urea ammoniation
| Ligno-cellulose components (%) | Straw type |
| Control | Treated* |
| Ic1 | Ic2 | Ic3 | Ic4 |
| CF | 46.37 | 46.48 | 46.25 | 45.03 | 44.27 | ADF | 52.42 | 52.85 | 52.99 | 51.91 | 52.20 | NDF | 78.63 | 78.81 | 77.75 | 75.14 | 75.08 | ADL | 10.25 | 11.11 | 11.31 | 10.51 | 10.50 | Cellulose | 42.17 | 41.74 | 41.68 | 41.40 | 41.70 | Hemicellulose | 26.21 | 25.96 | 24.76 | 23.23 | 22.88 |
| *Ic (1, 2, 3, 4): Treated straw exposed to weeks of incubation |
| | Table 3: Fate of urea-N in treated straw of different incubation period
| Sl. No. | Attributes | Incubation period (weeks) |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| a. | N in straw (g) | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.550 | b. | Added urea-N (g) | 2.090 | 2.090 | 2.090 | 2.090 | c. | Total N (g) (a+b) | 2.640 | 2.640 | 2.640 | 2.640 | d. | N in treated straw post-incubation (pre-exposure) (g) | 2.624 | 2.224 | 2.208 | 2.176 | e. | N in treated straw (g) (21 days post exposure) | 1.632 | 1.360 | 0.992 | 0.992 | f. | Residual urea-N (g) | 1.059 | 0.645 | 0.166 | 0.142 | g. | Straw bound N (g) (e-f) | 0.573 | 0.715 | 0.826 | 0.850 | h. | N retained (pre-exposure) (g) (d-a-f) | 1.015 | 1.029 | 1.492 | 1.484 | i. | Net N retained (g) (post-exposure) (g-a) | 0.023 | 0.165 | 0.276 | 0.300 | j. | N loss during incubation (g) (c-d) | 0.016 | 0.416 | 0.432 | 0.464 | k. | N loss post-exposure (g) (d-e) | 0.992 | 0.864 | 1.216 | 1.184 | l. | Total N loss (g) (j+k) | 1.008 | 1.280 | 1.648 | 1.648 | m. | N retained pre-exposure (%) [h/(b-f) × 100] | 98.45 | 71.21 | 77.55 | 76.18 | n. | N retained (% added urea-N) (i/b × 100) | 1.10 | 7.89 | 13.21 | 14.35 | o. | Net N retained (%) [i/(b-f) × 100] | 2.23 | 11.42 | 14.35 | 15.40 | P. | N gain by straw (%) [(e-a)/a × 100] | 96.73 | 47.27 | 80.36 | 80.36 | q. | Net N gain by straw (%) [(g-a)/a × 100] | 4.18 | 30.00 | 50.18 | 54.55 |
| |
| References | | AOAC
1990.
Official Methods of Analysis,
12th ed.Association of Official Analytical Chemist.
Washington, DC, USA. TopBack | | BharR., GargA.K., PathakN.N.
1998.
Effect of sealing methods on nitrogen loss during urea ammoniation of wheat straw.
Indian Journal of Dairy Science,
51:
96–99. TopBack | | BorhamiB.E.A., SundstolF., GarmoT.H.
1982.
Studies on ammonia treated straw. II. Fixation of ammonia in treated straw by spraying with acids.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
7:
53–59. TopBack | | CanequeV., VelascoS., SanchaJ.L., ManzanaresC., SouzaO.
1998.
Effect of moisture and temperature on the degradability of fibre and nitrogen fractions in barley straw treated with urea.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
74:
241–258. TopBack | | ChermitiA., NefzaouiA., CordesseR.
1989.
Parametres d' ureolyse et digestibilite de la paille traitee a I'uree.
Annals of Zootechnology,
38:
63–72. TopBack | | CloeteS.W.P., KritzingerN.M.
1984.
A laboratory assessment of various treatment conditions affecting the ammoniation of wheat straw by urea. 1. The effect of temperature, moisture level and treatment period.
South African Journal of Animal Science,
14:
55–58. TopBack | | DassR.S., MehraU.R., VermaA.K.
2000.
Nitrogen fixation and in situ dry matter and fibre constituents disappearance of wheat straw treated with urea and boric acid in Murrah buffalo calves.
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science,
13:
1133–36. TopBack | | HassounP., GeoffroyF., SaminadinG., PriorP., BeramisM.
1990.
Studies on the ammoniation of sugarcane bagasse by urea. Effect of moisture, urea levels, urease source and treatment periods on composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility and evolution of ureolytic bacteria.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
29:
113–129. TopBack | | IbrahimM.N.M.
1986.
Efficiency of urea ammonia treatment. In:
Rice Straw and Related Feeds in Ruminant Rations.
(Eds. IbrahimM.N.M., SchiereJ.B.),
Department of Tropical Animal Production, Agricultural University,
Wagewingen, The Netherlands. pp.
171–179. TopBack | | JayasuriyaM.C.N., PearceG.R.
1983.
The effect of urease enzyme on treatment time and the nutritive value of straw treated with ammonia and ME2.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
8:
271–281. TopBack | | LohaniM.N., TrungL.T., OkamotoA., AbenirE.E.
1986.
Hastening urea treatment of rice straw with either Gliricidia sepium or poultry manure.
Philipines Agriculturist,
69:
143–157. TopBack | | MandalA., SilB., SantraA., KamraD.N., PathakN.N.
1997.
An alternative technique of ammoniation by ensiling straw with urea to minimize loss of added nitrogen.
Journal of Applied Animal Research,
11:
195–200. TopBack | | MandellI.B., ChristisonG.I., NicholsonH.H., CoxworthE.C.
1988.
The effect of variation in the water content of wheat straw before ammoniation on its nutritive value for beef cattle.
Animal Feed Science and Technobgy,
20:
111–124. TopBack | | NelsonM.L., KlopfensteinT.J., BrittonR.A., LowryS.R.
1985.
Protein supplementation of ammoniated roughages. Ill. Corncobs supplemented with a blood meal-corn gluten meal mixture: steer studies.
Journal of Animal Science,
61:
1567–1575. TopBack | | ReidG.W., OrskovE.R., KayM.
1988.
A note on the effect of variety, type of straw and ammonia treatment on digestibility and on growth rate in steers.
Animal Production,
47:
157–160. TopBack | | SolaimanS.G., HornG.W., OwensF.N.
1979.
Ammonium hydroxide treatment of wheat straw.
Journal of Animal Science,
49:
802–808. TopBack | | SundstolF., CoxworthE., MowatD.N.
1978.
Improving the nutritive value of straw and other low quality roughages by treatment with ammonia.
World Review of Animal Production,
26:
13–21. TopBack | | Van SoestP.J., Mascarenhas-FerreiraA., HarleyR.D.
1984.
Chemical properties of fibre in relation to nutritive quality of ammonia-treated forages.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
10:
155–164. TopBack | | Van SoestP.J., RobertsonJ.B., LewisB.A.
1991.
Methods of dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.
Journal of Dairy Science,
74:
3583–3597. TopBack | | WattG.W., ChrispJ.D.
1954.
The determination of urea in feeding-stuffs.
Analytical Chemistry,
26:
452. TopBack | | YadavB.S., VirkA.S.
1994.
The fixation of nitrogen using acid, green forage and germinated barley during urea treatment of straws.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
50:
123–135. TopBack |
| |
|
|
|