(3.147.83.8)
Users online: 21450     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Indian Journal of Applied Basic Medical Sciences
Year : 2017, Volume : 19a, Issue : 28
First page : ( 90) Last page : ( 95)
Print ISSN : 0975-8917. Online ISSN : 2249-7935.

A comparative study of propofol versus sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion in patients undergoing burns surgery

Dr. Panjabi Gauri, Dr. Desai Nipa*, Dr. Vaghela Yogesh

Department of Anesthesiology, NHL Medical college and VS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Pin-380006

*Author for correspondence: Dr. Nipa N Desai, MD, E-mail: drnipadesai@yahoo.co.in

Online published on 17 February, 2017.

Abstract

Background and Objectives

The laryngeal mask airway[LMA] provides a useful alternative for airway management during spontaneous or controlled ventilation. LMA can be inserted successfully after suppression of airway reflexes under deep anesthesia using intravenous propofol or inhalational method using sevoflurane. The anesthesiologist's priority in burns patients undergoing surgery are to maintain cardiovascular stability & secure airway.

Methods

A cross sectional STUDY WAS CARRIED OUT in 50 patients of ASA gtoup I& II aged between 15–60 years of either sex having burn injury and divided into 2 groups of twenty five each in medical college in Gujarat. Induction time, quality of LMA insertion and complications during insertion as well as post operative was noted.

Patient's vitals were measured before induction, immediately after LMA insertion and 5 min, 8min, & 10 min. after LMA insertion.

Result

Mean induction time was 61.88±6.71 seconds in group A & 92.8±6.55 seconds in group B. LMA was successfully inserted in all cases. In group-A LMA insertion was done in 1st attempt in all patients, while in group-B 5 patients(20%) required 2nd attempt. Decrease in mean arterial pressure after LMA insertion in group-A was significant compare to group-B. in group-A there washigher incidence of hypotension, apnoea>30 seconds and pain on injection site while in groip-B there was high incidence of coughing during insertion and PONV.

Conclusion

Our study found that both propofol & sevoflurane provide good quality of anesthesia for insertion of LMA in burns patients. As sevoflurane causes less hemodynamic changes than propofol which is beneficial in burns patients. So sevoflurane is better alternative to propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion

Top

Keywords

LMA, propofol, sevoflurane, burns patient, hemodynamic changes.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
754,049,843 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.