(3.142.12.170)
Users online: 7683     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Year : 2022, Volume : 12, Issue : 1
First page : ( 73) Last page : ( 78)
Print ISSN : 2229-3744. Online ISSN : 2250-0499. Published online : 2022 March 21.
Article DOI : 10.5958/2250-0499.2022.00017.9

Studies on changes in chemical constituents of raw mango powder (Amchur) during storage

Shinde US*, Pujari KH, Shedge MS

College of Agriculture, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist Ratnagiri, 415712, Maharashtra, India

*Email for correspondence: udayshinde1010@gmail.com

Online published on 21 February, 2022.

Received:  12  ,  2021; Accepted:  31  ,  2021.

Abstract

Study was done on changes taking place in chemical constituents of raw mango powder (Amchur) during storage in the post-harvest technology laboratory of the horticulture section of Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra. The biochemical analysis of nutritional values viz acidity, ascorbic acid, starch and beta-carotene were carried out and were found to be decreased during a period of 9 months and the moisture, total soluble solids, reducing sugar and total sugar were found to be increased.

Top

Keywords

Amchur, Drying, Dehydration, Blanching, Ambient temperature.

Top

Introduction

Raw green mangoes are mainly used in the processing of pickles, chutneys and dehydrated powder (Amchur). Raw mango is known to possess good amount of citric and mallic acid along with other nutrients (Rao et al 2012). Dry mango powder also known as Amchur is a fruity spice used to add citrusy flavour to various Indian foods. It is a special Indian spice that is made by grinding dried mango slices. The powder is known to attract the acidic and spicy flavour of the unripe mango and extend it in all the curries and chutneys in Indian cuisines. Amchur is recognized at national level by ISI as one of the spices and condiments listed in the IS specification. Dehydration of raw mangoes for preparation of Amchur was studied in detail by number of workers (Dabhade and Khedkar 1980c, Goyal et al 2006, Mehta and Tomar 1982). Packaging of Amchur is done in friction top tins or poly-lined gunny bags. Lot of variation is observed in quality of Amchur prepared in different states of the country with regards to colour, texture and acidity. In the present study an attempt has been made studying changes occurring during storage of Amchur packed in 100, 200, 300 and 400 gauges high density polyethylene.

Top

Material and Methods

Seventy five per cent mature mango fruits of cv Alphonso were obtained from Department of Horticulture, Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra during 2008 and 2009. The fruits were washed, peeled and cut lengthwise into slices of 1.5 cm. The slices were treated as per the treatments, dried/dehydrated and powdered by grinding, sieved and packed in 100, 200, 300 and 400 gauge HDPE bags of 8 cm x 8 cm size and stored at ambient temperature. These were analyzed for acidity, starch, ascorbic acid and beta-carotene at three months interval during storage period of nine months. The experiment was laid out in FCRD with 14 main treatments, four sub-treatments and three replications.

The main treatments were T1 (Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 0.5% KMS + sun drying), T2 (Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.0% KMS+ sun drying), T3 (Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.5% KMS + sun drying), T4 (Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 0.5% KMS + cabinet drying), T5 (Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.0% KMS + cabinet drying), T6 (Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.5% KMS + cabinet drying), T7 [Slices dip in 0.5% KMS for 5 min + sun drying (no blanching)], T8 [Slices dip in 0.1% KMS for 5 min + sun drying (no blanching)], T9 [Slices dip in 1.5% KMS for 5 min + sun drying (no blanching)], T10 [Slices dip in 0.5% KMS for 5 min + cabinet drying (no blanching)], T11 Slices dip in 1.0% KMS for 5 min + cabinet drying (no blanching)], T12 (Slices dip in 1.5% KMS for 5 min + cabinet drying), T13 [No blanching + no KMS + sun drying (control)], T14 [No blanching + no KMS + cabinet drying (control)] and four sub-treatments were P1 (100 gauge polyethylene), P2 (200 gauge polyethylene), P3 (300 gauge polyethylene), P4 (400 gauge polyethylene).

Top

Results and Discussion

The data on changes in moisture, TSS, acidity, reducing sugar, total sugar, ascorbic acid, starch and beta-carotene of Amchur during storage are presented in Table 1.

Moisture: Lowest moisture content was reported in treatment T1 (9.00%) and packaging material P4 (9.41%) and was found to be best as compared to all other treatments and packaging materials. The reason for lowest moisture content in 400 gauge packaging material could be attributed to more thickness of the polythene. Highest moisture was reported in treatment T14 (12.59%) and packaging material P1 (12.59%). The gain in moisture during storage is attributed to moisture absorption from the atmosphere and permeability of the polythene bags to moisture vapour. Analogus results to present findings are reported by Dhabhade and Khedkar (1980a, 1980b) in Amchur.

TSS: Highest TSS was noticed in treatment T6 (9.12°B) which was at par with T5 (9.08°B) and significantly higher over rest of the treatments. Packaging material P4 recorded the highest TSS (8.26°B). The increase in TSS during storage could be attributed to the conversion of non-reducing sugar into reducing sugar by acids present in the product. However Raorane (2003) recorded no change in TSS of Kokum rind powder prepared from rind of Kokum after preparation of syrup after 8 months storage in glass jars.

Acidity: Acidity decreased in all treatments irrespective of the packaging material at 3, 6 and 9 months storage. Maximum acidity was recorded in T13 (13.83%) and was found to be significantly superior over all other treatments. P4 packaging material recorded highest acidity (11.40%) which was significantly superior over all other packaging materials. Treatment combination T13P4 recorded highest acidity (13.99%). Interaction effects were found significant throughout the storage period. Lowest acidity was recorded by T1 and packaging material P1 during the complete storage period. Amchur prepared from treatment T13 and packed in P4 registered highest acidity compared to other treatments and packaging materials which could be due to absence of blanching whereas lowest acidity was recorded by T1P4 which could be due to loss of acid during blanching process. The decrease in acidity during storage period could probably be due to disappearance of SO2 from the Amchur. Similar results were reported by Dabhade and Khedkar (1980a, 1980b) in Amchur.

Reducing sugar and total sugar: At 9 months storage period, maximum reducing sugar was found to be in T14 (15.65%) and was significantly superior over all other treatments. The interaction effects were found to be significant. Amchur packed in packaging material P4 recorded highest reducing sugar (12.13%) and was significantly superior over all other treatments.

Maximum total sugar was reported in treatment T14 (26.32%) during nine months storage period. Similarly maximum total sugar was reported in P4 packaging material (20.97%) which was significantly higher over rest of the packaging materials. The interaction effects were also found to be significant.

Increase in reducing and total sugar during storage could be attributed to more rapid hydrolysis of polysaccharides and their subsequent conversion to sugars. Similar results were reported by Dabhade and Khedkar (1980a, 1980b) in Amchur prepared from cv Totapuri and seedling mango.

Ascorbic acid: Highest ascorbic acid was recorded in T6 (26.47 mg/100 g) at 9 months storage. Packaging material P4 recorded highest ascorbic acid (19.62 mg/ 100 g) at 9 month storage. T6P4 recorded highest ascorbic acid (28.44 mg/100 g) at 9 months storage period. Lowest ascorbic acid was noticed in treatment T14 and packaging material P1. Interaction effects were non-significant during 9 months storage period.

The highest content of ascorbic acid in T6P4 could be due to the dipping of slices in higher concentration of preservative solution used at the time of blanching and dehydration in cabinet drier which might have prevented loss of ascorbic acid. Loss of ascorbic acid was rather rapid in sun-dried samples which could be attributed to exposure of raw mango slices to sunlight. Similar results have been reported by Dhabade and Khedkar (1980a, 1980b).

Starch: Maximum starch was observed in T6 (23.54%) at 9 months storage and was significantly superior over all other treatments. With regards to packaging material highest starch content was noticed in P4 (20.29%) in 9 months storage. Interaction effects were found to be significant. Treatment combination T6P4 (23.81%) recorded maximum starch content. The high starch in T6P4 could be due to dipping of slices in higher concentration of preservative solution and dehydration in cabinet drier which helped to reduce the loss of starch. Loss in content of starch was slightly more in sun-dried samples which could be attributed to the exposure of raw mango slices to sunlight. Decrease in starch could be ascribed to the hydrolysis of starch. Similar results were reported by Dhabade and Khedkar (1980a, 1980b) in Amchur prepared from cv Totapuri and seedling mango.

Beta-carotene: Maximum beta-carotene was noticed in T6 (287 mg/100 g) at 9 months storage and packaging material P4 (254 mg/100 g) and was significantly superior over all other treatments. Treatment combination T6P4 (291 mg/ 100 g) recorded highest beta-carotene. The highest content of beta-carotene could be due to the dipping of slices in the higher concentration of preservative solution and dehydration in drier which preserved the carotene. Loss of beta-carotene was more in sun-dried samples which could be due to exposure of raw slices to sunlight. The decrease in beta-carotene during storage may be due to temperature and light effect on pigments. Similar observations were reported by Vijayanand et al (2001) in mango chunks.

Top

Conclusion

Moisture content of Amchur was found to be high in control whereas it was low in Amchur prepared by blanching slices for five minutes + five minutes dip in 0.5 per cent KMS + sun drying. Maximum TSS, ascorbic acid, starch and beta-carotene was observed in Amchur prepared by blanching slices for five minutes + five minutes dip in 1.5 per cent KMS + cabinet drying and lowest in Amchur prepared by no blanching + no KMS + cabinet drying (control) whereas lowest ascorbic acid, starch, beta-carotene were noticed in Amchur prepared without blanching + no KMS + sundrying (control). Acidity was found to be highest in Amchur prepared without blanching + no KMS + sun drying (control) and lowest was seen in Amchur prepared by blanching slices for 5 minutes + 5 minutes dip in 0.5 per cent KMS + sun drying. Reducing and total sugar was found to be maximum in Amchur prepared without blanching + no KMS + cabinet drying (control) and minimum in treatment comprising blanching slices for 5 minutes + 5 minutes dip in 0.5 per cent KMS + sun drying.

Top

Tables

Table 1.:

Effect of blanching, drying and dehydration on chemical composition of Amchur packed in different gauge packaging material during storage period of nine months



TreatmentInitial valueMoisture (%)Initial valueTotal soluble solid (°B)Initial valueTitratable acidity (%)
P1P2P3P4MeanP1P2P3P4MeanP1P2P3P4Mean
T15.6010.409.508.767.359.007.188.088.138.188.218.1513.4010.2210.2910.3810.4210.33
T25.6510.629.578.887.749.207.238.118.278.348.388.2713.7010.3410.4310.5210.6310.48
T35.8210.699.689.017.729.278.058.858.928.979.018.9414.5810.7710.8510.9110.9810.88
T45.9011.2510.289.477.389.608.108.968.999.009.059.0013.0610.4610.5810.6810.7710.63
T56.1011.4310.609.858.3310.058.169.019.059.109.159.0813.5510.1310.2010.3010.3710.26
T66.5012.3011.3510.709.8411.058.209.039.069.159.209.1213.6510.4910.5410.6110.6810.58
T76.4512.4411.7510.739.4211.087.057.877.937.998.047.9615.3211.2511.3411.4511.5411.39
T86.4912.2811.2810.5810.2511.097.087.787.847.888.007.8815.6211.6411.7111.8011.9011.76
T96.5612.6911.8711.2710.0011.437.107.918.008.048.068.0015.7011.9211.9812.0712.1412.03
T106.6812.8711.8511.409.7811.477.127.927.598.008.107.9916.8011.2311.3411.4411.5111.38
T117.1213.1612.5411.6910.6611.967.148.008.078.088.138.0715.0311.5511.6311.7111.7911.67
T127.1613.3612.8711.8211.4311.997.168.198.258.308.358.2715.1411.5111.5811.7011.7811.64
T137.2213.3012.5011.4810.3712.225.686.676.736.786.846.7518.6613.6713.8013.8913.9913.83
T148.1213.6012.8611.5310.7712.595.756.896.947.027.086.9417.8112.9613.0513.1313.4313.10
Mean12.5910.8610.189.418.098.158.208.2611.1711.2511.3411.40

TopBack

:

MoistureTotal soluble solidsTitratable acidity
SECD0.01SECD0.01SECD0.01
Treatment (T)0.0230.0830.0340.1300.0380.138
Packaging (P)0.0120.0430.0180.0720.0200.072
Initial value0.0460.1670.068NS0.0770.302

TopBack

:

TreatmentInitial valueReducing sugar(%)Initial valueTotal sugar(%)Initial valueAscorbic acid (mg/ 100mg)
P1P2P3P4MeanP1P2P3P4MeanP1P2P3P4Mean
T14.899.129.419.589.829.4813.3418.6418.7818.8718.6718.7444.2012.9313.8114.2015.0013.99
T25.109.229.409.619.839.5113.3918.8918.9619.0919.1319.0247.0615.1116.4617.4019.2017.04
T35.249.659.759.879.949.7813.4518.9819.0619.1419.2319.1047.9015.9817.2017.5119.2317.46
T46.3010.1810.3210.3810.4310.3314.2419.4119.3819.4619.5119.3555.4020.0021.2622.2021.8621.32
T56.3810.4810.5310.5810.6110.5514.3919.3719.4619.5219.5919.4861.5221.1822.5023.3525.0823.05
T66.7610.6510.7610.8610.9610.8114.5119.3219.5219.6419.7419.5862.5024.5025.6327.3028.4426.47
T78.2012.2012.2812.3212.4012.3015.0019.8519.9320.0120.0819.8440.6512.6013.8015.2015.8014.35
T88.2412.4312.4912.5912.6512.5415.2619.9620.0020.2820.3320.1441.5013.2314.2215.2317.4015.01
T98.3112.7912.8312.8812.9112.8515.3220.1020.2120.2920.3820.2542.7014.0515.0016.2017.4615.66
T108.7612.9612.9813.0113.0613.0015.9420.8720.9521.0821.1721.0249.1017.1018.4820.4620.8319.22
T119.2213.1313.2313.2813.3413.2416.0221.1521.2421.3521.4221.2952.6518.6019.9121.4022.6020.63
T129.2413.4413.5913.6913.7613.6216.1221.1721.2821.3821.5821.3553.4019.2020.4021.4022.4121.81
T1312.0513.9013.9914.1714.3414.1020.0125.9326.1126.1826.2826.1236.6511.2412.0012.7514.4012.59
T1412.2915.4415.6315.7415.7715.6521.1526.1526.2326.3926.4926.3250.0012.4013.4014.8015.2113.95
Mean11.8211.9412.0412.1320.7020.7920.9020.9716.5017.4318.5219.62

TopBack

:

Reducing sugarTotal sugarAscorbic acid
SECD0.01SECD0.01SECD0.01
Treatment (T)0.0090.0320.0150.0540.1490.542
Packaging (P)0.0050.0180.0840.0330.0800.291
Initial value0.0190.0690.0310.1120.299NS

TopBack

:

TreatmentInitial value Starch(%)Initial valueBeta-carotene (mg/100 g)
P1P2P3P4MeanP1P2P3P4Mean
T125.9820.6220.7920.9221.0720.85515262263265269261
T226.9221.3721.4421.5321.6221.49522263266268271265
T328.1221.7922.2122.3522.4222.19528265268270274268
T427.3222.4322.5022.8322.9322.67545269274274279273
T527.8722.6322.7522.8722.9622.80553275279281285280
T628.6523.1323.5623.6823.8123.54572282285288291287
T721.4216.0716.1816.2616.4016.22422250252255257252
T823.3617.2117.3217.4717.6317.41428252254257250250
T924.0118.9919.1719.2919.4019.21437255257260252252
T1024.8819.7819.9720.0920.2620.02462255259260263259
T1125.4620.0620.2120.3420.4720.27467258260253258258
T1226.4820.1920.2720.5620.6620.42479261263267270265
T1320.0915.1415.2515.4115.5815.34348146142145148144
T1420.6115.7315.7215.8716.0215.84415149151155158152
Mean19.6519.8019.9520.29246248250254

TopBack

:

StarchBeta-carotene
SECD0.01SECD0.01
Treatment (T)0.0350.1270.3161.150
Packaging (P)0.0190.0690.1690.615
Initial value0.0710.2810.632NS

T1 : Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 0.5% KMS + sun drying, T2: Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.0% KMS + sun drying, T3: Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.5% KMS + sun drying, T4: Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 0.5% KMS + cabinet drying, T5: Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.0% KMS + cabinet drying, T6: Blanching slices for 5 min + 5 min dip in 1.5% KMS + cabinet drying, T7: Slices dip in 0.5% KMS for 5 min + sun drying (no blanching), T8: Slices dip in 0.1% KMS for 5 min + sun drying (no blanching), T9: Slices dip in 1.5% KMS for 5 min + sun drying (no blanching), T10 : Slices dip in 0.5% KMS for 5 min + cabinet drying (no blanching), T11 : Slices dip in 1.0% KMS for 5 min + cabinet drying(no blanching), T12:Slices dip in 1.5% KMS for 5 min + cabinet drying, T13:No blanching + no KMS + sun drying(control), T14:No blanching + no KMS + sun drying(control), P1: 100 gauage polyethylene, P2: 300 gauage polyethylene, P4: 400 gauage polyethylene.

TopBack

References

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
749,296,687 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.