(3.147.89.85)
Users online: 14496     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Year : 2022, Volume : 12, Issue : 2
First page : ( 111) Last page : ( 116)
Print ISSN : 2229-3744. Online ISSN : 2250-0499. Published online : 2022  07.
Article DOI : 10.5958/2250-0499.2022.00060.X

Study on the population dynamics of fruit flies (Bactrocera spp) in guava orchard in southwest Haryana

Aarti1, Gaur Ram Karan2*, Yadav Sunita1

1Department of EntomologyChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar125004Haryana, India

2ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, CCSHAU, Rohtak124001Haryana, India

*Email for Correspondence: drramkaran1965@gmail.com

Online Published on 07 May, 2022.

Received:  12  December,  2021; Accepted:  25  ,  2022.

Abstract

The experiments on population dynamics of fruit flies (Bactrocera dorsalis and B zonata) were carried out in guava orchard of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Bawal, Haryana during 2020-21. The fruit flies were recorded at weekly interval by using methyl eugenol pheromone trap. Results showed that fruit flies were present in the field from April to November in guava orchard in southwest Haryana. The highest number of fruit flies (132 /trap/week) were recorded during last week of August 2020. The peak of fruit flies population coincided with the ripening of guava fruits. The fruit fly population exhibited significant positive correlation with minimum temperature, morning and evening relative humidity and rainfall. The results of the present study revealed that peak infestation (75.0%) in guava fruits was during last week of August. These fruit flies were recorded as a serious pest of guava fruits in southwest Haryana.

Top

Keywords

Fruit flies, Methyl eugenol, Pheromone, Correlation, Infestation.

Top

Introduction

Guava (Psidium guajava L) is a climacteric fruit of family Myrtaceae originated in tropical America. It is one of the most important fruits in India as it occupies fourth position in area and production after mango, banana and citrus. It is found to be quite resilient and prolific bearer, highly productive and remunerative. This fruit is a rich source of nutrition as it is a major source of vitamin A, B and C (Anita et al 2012). It also contains good amount of pectin, calcium and phosphorus with a characteristic flavour. The fruit quality is superior in winter rather than rainy season and for this reason, rainy season crop is avoided in some areas to fetch better yield in winter season. Guava fruit can be consumed as fresh or in processed form. The fruit is processed in number of products like jelly, jam and nectar. When a guava orchard is established in large area, the pest also gets gradually established in the orchard which in turn creates a serious threat to the crop, the main reason behind the low production of crop in spite of growing in the vast area.

Sarwar (2006) identified major insect species of guava which included scale insect, fruit fly, red-banded thrips, mealy bugs, mites, stink bug, guava moth and guava whitefly. Fruit fly of the genus Bactrocera is the most destructive pest and it infests 62 species of plants belonging 30 families, many of which are commercially important (Kunprom et al 2015). Due to its dispersal capacity, high mobility and fecundity, a lot of fruits and vegetables like peach, mango, guava, citrus, tomato, cucurbits etc are infested by fruit flies which affect the produce both qualitatively and quantitatively. Due to the fruit fly infestation, market value of the fruits gets reduced. The fruit fly caused serious incidence in guava fruits and it varied from 20.0 to 46.0 per cent which is a matter of serious concern (Haseeb 2007). Although a number of species attack the fruits but only few species are found in orchards. The documentation on the population dynamics of fruit fly in guava ecosystem gives both opportunities and challenges for proper planning and preceding the timely management practices. The present study was conducted on population dynamics of fruit flies in guava orchard in southwest Haryana.

Top

Material and Methods

The investigations on population dynamics of fruit flies, Bactrocera spp were carried out in the guava orchard of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Bawal, Haryana located in the low rainfall zone of southwestern Haryana (28.1° N, 76.5° E and 266 m amsl) during 2020-21. The soil of the region is light-textured and loamy-sand with poor fertility and low water holding capacity. Population dynamics of fruit flies was recorded under natural field conditions. A pre-determined number of guava trees on the population dynamics of fruit flies were kept free from pesticides application during the course of the study.

Observations on population dynamics on fruit fly were recorded at weekly interval from April 2020 to December 2020. The per cent fruit damage was also calculated by counting fruits bearing pinhole damage/ovipositional marks and brown spots. Infestation symptoms of different fruit flies are similar therefore it was difficult to distinguish among them. Therefore the infestation percentage was estimated for all fruit flies together. The infestation per cent damage was determined as ratio of number of infested fruits and total of inspected fruits. The observations were recorded on five randomly selected trees.

Five traps filled with methyl eugenol were installed at an interval of 10 meter. The installation of pheromone traps was continued from April 2020 to December 2020 and wooden blocks filled with methyl eugenol replaced at monthly interval. The fruit flies attracted in traps (dead flies only) were counted at weekly interval and the mean captured flies per trap per week were calculated. The traps were hung at a height of approximately 1.5 m. The data on weather parameters viz maximum and minimum temperature, morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity and rainfall were collected from meteorological laboratory of Regional Research Station, Bawal, Haryana. Correlation analysis was made for the data on different abiotic parameters with the damage and population of fruit flies.

Top

RESULTS and Discussion

The results revealed that Bactrocera dorsalis and B zonata were the most serious pest of guava under the ecological conditions of Bawal, Haryana. The first appearance of fruit fly was recorded in 16th standard meteorological week and highest number of fruit flies (132/trap/week) was recorded during 35th SMW (last week of August) when temperature ranged from 24.2 to 32.8°C, relative humidity from 66.0 to 90.0 per cent and total rainfall 32.4 mm. The present findings are in close conformity with the reports of Gupta and Bhatia (2000) who reported that maximum population of B dorsalis and B zonata was recorded in August-September. Similar results were obtained by Rana et al (1992) from Haryana. They recorded the maximum (427.2 and 517.0 males/trap) catches of B dorsalis and B zonata respectively during September. Dale and Patel (2010) also studied the population dynamics of fruit flies (B zonata and B dorsalis) on guava at Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat from January to December 2001 and observed that the maximum number of fruit fly population was in September and the minimum in May.

It is evident from Table 1 (Fig 1) that fruit fly remained active from third week of April up to third week of November during 2020 in the study area conditions. The population started declining after 4th week of August with lowest trap catches of 2 fruit flies/trap/week during third week of November 2020. The findings of Boscan de Martinez and Godoy (1989) are in confirmation with the present results as they also recorded the population peaks of fruit fly in guava orchard in September 1980. They further reported that population level was close to zero from April to June 1981. There was no fruit fly observed after third week of November in guava orchard in the present invetigations. The findings of the present investigations are more or less similar to the studies of Makhmoor and Singh (1998) who reported highest trap catches of B dorsalis during July in Jammu and Kashmir at maximum and minimum temperature of 33.6 and 22.5°C and relative humidity 90.3 and 57.0 per cent respectively. Dale (2002) observed the highest activity of fruit flies, Bactrocera spp in September concurring with fruiting season of guava and minimum activity in the month of May. In a study conducted by Chaudhary and Jamal (2002) it was found that maximum activity of B dorsalis and B zonata was observed from August to October which concurred with the ripening of guava at Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Fruit fly infestation was initially noticed during 25th SMW (third week of June 2020) with only 2.0 per cent infested fruits as evident from Table 1 (Fig 2). The results revealed that peak infestation (75.0%) was recorded during 35th SMW (last week of August) when temperature ranged from 24.2 to 32.8°C and relative humidity 66.0 to 90.0 per cent. However infestation remained quite high (34.0 to 75.0%) during 32nd to 35th SMW. The present observation corroborates with the findings of Jose et al (2013) who recorded the highest fruit fly infestation on guava (92.49 ± 0.21%) followed by almond (67.32 ± 2.71%) and mango (56.50 ± 0.12%). Sarwar et al (2014) also recorded the peak population of B dorsalis (30-40 fruit flies/trap/week) and fruit infestation (7.05-9.05%) from June to August. These results are in agreement with the findings of Chaudhary and Jamal (2002) who recorded maximum (10.76 to 14.74%) damage of B zonata in guava orchard during August to September.

The correlation analysis between different weather parameters and Bactrocera spp population (Table 2, Fig 1) reveal that fruit fly exhibited highly significant positive correlation with minimum temperature (r= 0.615) morning relative humidity (r= 0.483) and evening relative humidity (r= 0.776) and total rainfall (r= 0.534). Thus when there was an increase in minimum temperature, relative humidity and total rainfall, fruit flies population also increased.

The correlation analysis between different weather parameters and Bactrocera spp infestation (Table 2, Fig 2) show that fruit fly infestation exhibited significant positive correlation with minimum temperature (r= 0.424), morning relative humidity (r= 0.473) and evening relative humidity (r= 0.573). Therefore with the increase in minimum temperature and relative humidity, fruit fly infestation also increased. The present findings are supported by the results of Jalaluddin et al (2001) who reported that fruit fly, B correcta exhibited positive correlation with minimum and maximum temperature, RH and rainfall during July-August in Tamil Nadu. Similarly Sarada et al (2001) reported that fruit fly population had positive correlation with minimum temperature and rainfall and a positive non-significant correlation with maximum temperature. These results are also supported by the work of Rana et al (1992) as there was positive correlation of fruit fly infestation with abiotic factors viz humidity and rainfall.

Dale and Patel (2010) studied the population dynamics of fruit flies (B zonata and B dorsalis) on guava at Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat from January to December 2001 and observed that fruit fly population exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with minimum temperature and relative humidity. Mishra et al (2012) also studied seasonal abundance of oriental fruit fly, B dorsalis in relation to environmental factors and observed non-significant correlation with maximum temperature but positive significant correlation with minimum temperature. Rajitha and Viraktamath (2006) reported that the B dorsalis showed a highly significant and positive correlation with minimum temperature and relative humidity.

The multiple regression analysis between infestation of guava fruit fly population and weather parameters (Table 3) indicated that all the weather parameters collectively accounted for 73 per cent variability. The present findings also show that influence of all weather parameters was significant (R2= 0.73) on guava fruit fly infestation and fruit fly population.

Top

Conclusion

On the basis of results it is concluded that first appearance of fruit fly was recorded in 16th standard meteorological week and highest number of fruit flies (132/trap/week) was recorded during last week of August. The guava fruit fly, B dorsalis Hendel and B zonatus Saunder were found to be the dominant species in guava ecosystem causing considerable damage to guava in southwest Haryana. The peak infestation (75.0%) was recorded during third week of September. Among the abiotic factors viz minimum temperature and relative humidity appeared to have overall influence in regulating the fruit flies of guava.

Top

Figures

Fig 1.:

Fruit fly population relationship with temperature, relative humidity and rainfall




TopBack

Fig 2.:

Fruit fly infestation relationship with temperature, relative humidity and rainfall



TopBack

Tables

Table 1.:

Population dynamics and fruit infestation of Bactrocera spp in guava orchard during 2020



SMWPeriod of observationAverage temperature (°C)Average RH (%)Total rainfall (mm)Average wind speed (km/h)Average sunshine hoursMean number of fruit flies trapped/trap /weekFruit fly infestation in guava fruits (%)
MaxMinME
1326 Mar - 01 Apr33.514.890.030.09.45.16.10.0-
1402 Apr - 08 Apr33.313.573.024.04.24.38.50.0-
1509 Apr - 15 Apr36.817.263.026.00.74.07.70.0-
1616 Apr - 22 Apr36.720.959.036.00.75.27.04.0-
1723 Apr - 29 Apr35.819.466.048.014.15.56.412.0-
1830 Apr - 06 May37.722.072.042.04.95.48.34.0-
1907 May - 13 May39.020.665.037.01.74.67.68.0-
2014 May - 20 May40.121.250.019.01.05.28.410.0-
2121 May - 27 May44.024.029.08.00.07.09.66.0-
2228 May - 03 Jun37.422.266.036.069.18.07.712.0-
2304 Jun - 10 Jun36.922.476.043.014.84.16.420.0-
2411 Jun - 17 Jun40.826.364.032.02.04.57.422.0-
2518 Jun - 24 Jun39.425.671.039.043.15.17.028.02.0
2625 Jun - 01 Jul38.426.467.049.01.06.55.120.02.0
2702 Jul - 08 Jul38.322.077.045.06.45.57.036.04.0
2809 Jul-15 Jul36.225.181.064.012.15.26.048.06.0
2916 Jul-22 Jul35.825.583.062.019.55.63.962.012.0
3023 Jul - 29 Jul35.124.986.060.014.64.76.768.018.0
3130 Jul - 05 Aug35.725.186.064.037.55.05.584.028.0
3206 Aug - 12 Aug35.025.989.066.09.15.65.280.034.0
3313 Aug - 19 Aug33.525.494.080.051.24.24.292.040.0
3420 Aug - 26 Aug30.823.794.082.044.36.33.6112.056.0
3527 Aug - 02 Sep32.824.290.066.032.45.15.0132.075.0
3603 Sep - 09 Sep34.723.890.065.011.35.14.882.050.0
3710 Sep - 16 Sep37.123.687.041.00.02.67.662.00.0
3817 Sep - 23 Sep38.124.479.038.00.04.16.948.00.0
3924 Sep - 30 Sep36.822.279.034.09.23.97.332.00.0
4001 Oct - 07 Oct37.617.666.017.00.04.58.224.00.0
4108 Oct - 14 Oct36.415.868.019.00.02.99.118.01.0
4215 Oct - 21 Oct35.315.874.017.00.02.47.514.01.0
4322 Oct - 28 Oct34.313.070.014.00.02.27.214.02.0
4429 Oct - 04 Nov31.09.566.012.00.02.97.510.02.0
4505 Nov - 11 Nov30.69.076.017.00.02.03.28.04.0
4612 Nov - 18 Nov27.010.287.043.014.02.14.45.04.0
4719 Nov - 25 Nov24.67.386.027.00.02.66.62.03.0
4826 Nov - 02 Dec25.19.182.028.00.02.96.10.00.0
4903 Dec - 09 Dec28.28.987.031.00.01.76.60.00.0
5010 Dec - 16 Dec19.39.990.053.00.03.04.30.00.0
5117 Dec - 23 Dec20.33.973.031.00.03.76.60.00.0
5224 Dec - 31 Dec19.43.692.038.00.02.66.00.00.0

SMW= Standard meteorological week, Max= Maximum, Min= Minimum, M= Morning, E= Evening


TopBack

Table 2.:

Correlation of weather parameters with fruit fly population and infestation



ParameterFruit fly populationFruit fly infestation
Maximum temperature (°C)r= 0.181NSr= 0.079NS
Minimum temperature (°C)r= 0.615**r= 0.424**
Morning RH (%)r= 0.483**r= 0.473**
Evening RH (%)r= 0.776**r= 0.573**
Total rain (mm)r= 0.534**r= 0.284NS
Average wind speed (km/h)r= 0.313*r= 0.106NS
Sunshine hoursr= -0.458**r= -0.355*

Significant at 5% LoS

Significant at 1% LoS, NS= Non-significant


TopBack

Table 3.:

Regression equation 5 – 6



Dependant variable (Y)Regression equationR2
Fruit fly infestationY= –29.741– 1.70 Tmax + 3.41 Tmin + 0.721 RHm – 0.193 RHe – 0.052KF – 2.649 WS + 0.16 SSH0.73
Fruit fly population Y= –34.941– 1.304 Tmax + 3.99 Tmin + 0.564 RHm + 0.343 RHe + 0.291 RF – 4.524 WS – 0.941 SSH0.73

Y= Per cent infestation Tmax= Maximum temperature Tmin= Minimum temperature RHm= Relative humidity in the morning RHe= Relative humidity in the evening RFe= Rainfall WS= Wind speed SSH= Sunshine hours

TopBack

References

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
746,819,316 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.