(18.191.230.106)
Users online: 14182     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery
Year : 2018, Volume : 4, Issue : 2
First page : ( 195) Last page : ( 203)
Print ISSN : 2395-1354. Online ISSN : 2395-1362.
Article DOI : 10.18231/2395-1362.2018.0039

Comparisonof efficacy of extramedullary fixation devices and proximal femoral nail in the management of subtrochanteric fracture femur

Deshpande Santosh1, Yemul Shriniwas2,*

1Assistant Professor, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Kumbhari, Solapur, Maharashtra, India

2Associate Professor, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Kumbhari, Solapur, Maharashtra, India

*Corresponding Author: Email: shinuortho@yahoo.co.in

Online published on 24 September, 2018.

Abstract

Introduction

Hip is one of the important joint for locomotion in human beings. So fractures in and around hip joint are of great concern to treatingsurgeon and patient. Wehavemade an attempt to evaluate these complex fractures and compared the efficacy of proximal femoral nail and extamedullary devices in treatment of subtrochanteric fracture femur.

Materials and Methods

After informed consent was given, all 56 consecutive patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur were randomized into two treatment groups. One group of patients were treated with dynamic hip screw or Dynamic condylar screw (Group I) and other group received proximal femoral nail (Group II). All procedures were performed by staff surgeons with patient supine on a fracture table.

Result

The mean operative time in Group I (93.57 min) was significantly higher than in Group II (80 min) with a P value of < 0.01. Average blood loss in Group I (190.14ml) was 2.4 times higher than in Group II (78.35 ml) with a P value of 0.008. There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups with regard to general complications.

Conclusion

We conclude that subtrochanteric fractures are difficult to understand and manage. We consider that the PFN is a good minimally invasive implant for unstable proximal femoral fractures when closed reduction is possible. In general, PFN afforded early return to physical activity, faster rehabilitation & walking ability, lesser blood loss and comparablesuccess rate.

Top

Keywords

Extramedullary fixation, Proximal femoral nail, Subtrochanteric fracture femur, Dynamic condylar screw.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
750,963,874 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.