(18.118.1.232)
Users online: 8504     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Year : 2019, Volume : 10, Issue : 12
First page : ( 160) Last page : ( 164)
Print ISSN : 0976-0245. Online ISSN : 0976-5506.
Article DOI : 10.37506/v10/i12/2019/ijphrd/192683

Effectiveness of Sublingual Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term

Parimkayala Rekha1, Shetty K. Shraddha2,*

1Registrar, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rainbow Hospitals, Currency Nagar, Vijayawada. Andhra Pradesh

2Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding Author: Dr. Shraddha Shetty K., Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India, e-mail: drshraddhashetty@gmail.com, Phone No.: 09886792043

Online published on 31 March, 2020.

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of 50microgram (mg) sublingual Misoprostol with 50 microgram (mg) oral misoprostol for labour induction at term.

Method

One hundred twenty women with medical or obstetric indication for induction of labour at term with unfavorable cervix were randomized to receive 50mcg of misoprostol either orally or sublingually. Primary outcome was number of women delivering vaginally within 24hrs of induction. The need for oxytocin, mode of delivery, doses of Misoprostol required and neonatal outcomes were analyzed and compared between the groups.

Results

Induction to vaginal delivery time was < 24hours in 43(71.7%) in sublingual group and 36(60%) women delivered vaginally in < 24hours in oral group. No significant difference was found in the number of women delivering vaginally within 24hrs of induction among both the groups. Time from administration of first dose to delivery in sublingual group was lesser compared to oral group. 46.7% of women required oxytocin in sublingual groups, whereas 75% in oral group which was statistically significant. Sublingual group had lesser number of women requiring more than 1 dose of misoprostol compared to the oral group.

Conclusion

Sublingual misoprostol seems to be having better efficacy than the oral misoprostol and has lesser induction to delivery interval. Hence can be considered to induce labour at term for ripening of cervix.

Top

Keywords

Sublingual administration, oral administration, misoprostol, induction, labour.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
745,957,632 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.