(3.149.229.253)
Users online: 10307     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Year : 2019, Volume : 10, Issue : 12
First page : ( 1289) Last page : ( 1292)
Print ISSN : 0976-0245. Online ISSN : 0976-5506.
Article DOI : 10.37506/v10/i12/2019/ijphrd/192225

Ultrasound Guidance for Introducing Spinal Anesthesia through Paramedian Approach Versus Landmark Guided Technique During Lower Limb Surgeries, Randomized Controlled Trial

Galal Sohib Mohamed1, Mohamed Dina Zakaria2, Fouad Ahmed Zaghloul2

1MD, Anaesthesia and SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

2Assistant Professor, Anaesthesia and SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Online published on 31 March, 2020.

Abstract

Introduction

Ultrasound imaging skills are appreciated for improving the safety of different puncture techniques supported with the fact that the advances in imaging quality have significantly improved our understanding of neuroaxial Sonoanatomy (1). Today, ultrasound imaging has been used to assist or guide central neuroaxial blocks (2).

Objectives

To identify the value of using the ultrasound guidance in applying spinal anaesthesia when compared with the conventional landmark guided approach, regarding the duration of applying the anaesthetic technique and incidence of associated common complications.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Method

178 patients scheduled to undergo elective lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia in El Kasr Al-Aini Hospital, Cairo University were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into landmark guided control group in which 89 patients received landmark guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia and ultrasound group in which 89 patients received real time ultrasound guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia.

Results

The mean numbers of puncture attempts, levels and needle redirections between the control group and ultrasound group were 1.61±0.83 vs. 1.12±0.36 (P value 0.013), 1.15±0.36 vs. 1.06±0.25 (p value 0.018) and 2.68±2.75 vs1.94±1.93 (p value 0.021) respectively. Also the duration recorded during applying the anaesthetic procedure for the control group and ultrasound group were 136.4±83.2 vs. 138.3±63.4 (P value 0.001) correspondingly.

Ultrasound guided group of patients showed significant lower incidence of bloody puncture and paraesthesia after engaging the needle through the dura.

Conclusion

Ultrasound guiding although it took longer duration in application but improved the ease of introducing spinal anesthesia, reduced the number of puncture attempts, number of puncture levels, number of needle redirections, and incidence of complications.

Top

Keywords

Ultrasound, Spinal anaesthesia, Guidance, Landmark, Neuroaxial.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
746,034,614 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.