Anterolateral Versus Posterior Approach in Management of Lower Dorsal and Upper Lumbar Traumatic & Pathological Spine Fractures Gomaa Mahmoud Ahmed1,*, Osman Ashraf Abdellatif2, Saadeldin Mohamed Khaled3, Hussein Mohamed Abdellatif2 1Assistant Lecturer, Neurosurgery Department Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Egypt, 2Lecturer, Neurosurgery Department Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Egypt, 3Professor, Neurosurgery Department Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt *Corresponding author: Mahmoud Ahmed Gomaa, Assistant Lecturer, Neurosurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Egypt, Email: dr_mah_gomaa2010@yahoo.com
Online published on 4 April, 2020. Abstract Purpose Comparing anterolateral versus posterior approach in decompression and stabilization of spine. Study design prospective comparative study. Patients and Method thirty patients have lower dorsal and upper lumbar spine fractures operated upon in the period from January 2016 to July 2017. Results Surgical management of thoracolumbar burst and pathological fractures, Anterolateral approach have not significant superior to posterior approach in terms of recovery neurological function and maintaining normal life activities. Anterior approach was better than posterior approach in rapid improvement of sphincteric control in patients with incomplete cord injury with sphincteric troubles. Top Keywords Thoracolumbar, anterolateral approach, posterior approach, laminectomy, corpectomy. Top |