(3.137.213.128)
Users online: 13269     
Ijournet
Email id
 

Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
Year : 2018, Volume : 9, Issue : 9
First page : ( 818) Last page : ( 822)
Print ISSN : 0976-0245. Online ISSN : 0976-5506.
Article DOI : 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01100.2

Similarity study of the Ar-Based motion analysis and therapist's manual rom measurement

Im Jong-Hun1, Yu Jae-Ho1,*

1Dept. Physical Therapy, Sun Moon University, Asan-si, Chungnam, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding Author: Jae-Ho Yu Professor, Department of physical therapy, Sunmoon University, Korea Email: naresa@sunmoon.ac.kr

Online published on 16 October, 2018.

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Augmented reality is a technology that simulates a 3-dimensional virtual field. The physical therapist considered AR measurement program be a more efficient measure of ROM. as set at p<0.05..

Method/Statistical Analysis

Forty healthy agreed and participated in the study. This study used AR-based motion analysis and Electro goniometer to measure ROM of each joint: shoulder joint, elbow joint, hip joint and knee joint. Volunteers performed three motion.: 45° shoulder abduction and 45° hip abduction in standing position(M1), 90° shoulder abduction, 90° elbow flexion, 90° hip flexion and 90° knee flexion in standing position(M2) and 90° shoulder flexion and 90° knee flexion in standing position(M3)..

Findings

This study investigated the difference between ROM measured by AR-based motion analysis and physical therapist`s manual used electro goniometer. ROM measurement of the used AR-based motion analysis and electro goniometer has similarly results. The ROM significantly difference with the 90° shoulder abduction measured motion analysis and electro goniometer. However, no significant difference was observed another motion at the M1, M2 and M3 position except the shoulder abduction 90°. Markerless Single camera motion analysis was successful measurement, the frontal and sagittal plane joint angles calculated from the markerless system. And both plane showed coefficient of reliability <0.5° for all angles. only 90° shoulder abduction has significant difference. For 180° shoulder abduction, scapular`s upward rotation angle is 60° and humerus` abduction angle is 120° should be considered. This is a scapulohumeral rhythm. 90° shoulder abduction at M2 appeared scapulohumeral rhythm so it has significant difference..

Improvements/Applications

Measurement using AR based motion analysis and electro goniometer were similarly to measure ROM. So motion analysis is easy to use and save the evaluation time.

Top

Keywords

Augmented reality, range of motion, electronic goniometer, motion analysis, technology, joint angle.

Top

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
745,250,015 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.